QB 91 Court of Appeal
Lawiki for and by law students - find us on Facebook if you want to help us edit this Law Wiki.
Not professional advice - LAWIKI cannot guarantee the validity of any information
In the case to which this reference refers ( QB 91 Court of Appeal), a motorist pleaded Automatism as a defence in a charge of causing death by reckless driving. The evidence showed that the defendant was able to steer in a straight line and recognize flashing lights, so the defence should not have been allowed. Automatism requires a 'total destruction of voluntary control'.